.

Judge Rules in Favor of Princeton University, NJ Transit in Dinky Suit

Save the Dinky officials are expected to decide whether to appeal by the end of January.

A Mercer County Superior Court judge has ruled in favor of Princeton University and NJ Transit in a suit filed in opposition to the Dinky move. 

NJ Chancery Judge Paul Innes handed down his order on Dec. 23, granting the defendants' request for summary judgement. Innes ruled that Princeton University was within its rights to move the Dinky station approximately 500 feet south because it had received the necessary approvals from NJ Transit. 

The Dinky, which runs between Princeton Borough on University Place and the Princeton Junction train station in West Windsor, has been running since May 29, 1865. It takes four minutes for the train to travel 2.7 miles and is popular among daily commuters to New York, university students and residents.

University officials announced plans to move the station south to make room for its now-under-construction Arts & Transit Neighborhood.

Members of Princeton's "Save the Dinky," a local grassroots organization, filed suit in October of 2011 against Princeton University, the Trustees of Princeton University and NJ Transit, claiming there was no legal basis to move the train station and seeking a court judgement to stop it.  

The lawsuit argued that the university had no right to move the Dinky based on an Oct. 30, 1984, agreement between Princeton University and NJ Transit.

But the judge said his reading of the 1984 agreement and a subsequent amendment in 1996, allowed for a move with the permission of NJ Transit. That approval was given, he said. 

"The court finds the terms of the agreements are facially clear," the decision read in part. "Under the terms of the 1984 Sales Agreement, as amended by the 1996 Agreement, Princeton University is permitted to propose, and NJ Transit is permitted to approve, a plan to relocate the train station and rail terminus 460 feet south within the Dinky station property."

According to a press release issued by Save the Dinky on Jan. 1, the court decision is important because it confirms that the decision to move the Dinky was a decision by the state, not the University. 

“NJ Transit has said again and again that the contract obligated it to agree to the University plan to move the terminus, and the University has said again and again that the contract gave it the 'right' to make a second move," Save the Dinky President Anita Garoniak said in the release. “The court ruling clears away the dust. The Judge said that the buck stops with NJ Transit.” 

Save the Dinky is expected to decide whether to appeal the ruling by the end of January. 

Garoniak said the Chancery decision is a helpful step for her group’s efforts to obtain a reversal of the decision to abandon Princeton’s in-town station.  

“Transit is obviously not a strong point of the Christie Administration,” she said.   “We have said all along and continue to believe,” she said, “that the University can build its arts buildings and parking access without robbing the community of its mobility. The station is not just a mass transportation asset but also a beloved Princeton landmark.”  

profprinceton January 12, 2014 at 08:08 AM
The hypocrisy of NJ transit not taking responsibility for what happened to the DINKY is not surprising. As a lifelong resident of NJ, it is always one hand washes the other and pay to play. Gov Christie as a University Trustee in a gross conflict of interest probably directed NJ transit agree with everything the university wanted. Who was going to go against governor on something like this if you were an employee at NJ transit. Clearly that would be career limiting as seen by the GWB fiasco and what it takes to be a Christie appointee. Congrats Governor on your son getting into Princeton last year.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »