patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Six Candidates Team Up for Joint Campaign: Three Others on Their Own

On Primary Day, June 5, voters will cast their votes for six members of the new Princeton Council for the consolidated community.

 

 

Six of the nine Democratic candidates for Princeton Council have teamed together to conduct joint mailings, fundraising and advertising.

The six candidates are those endorsed by Princeton Township and Borough democratic committees on March 26: Jo Butler, Jenny Crumiller, Heather Howard, Lance Liverman, Bernie Miller and Patrick Simon.

Butler, Crumiller and Howard are members of Borough Council. Liverman and Miller are members of Township Committee. Simon is a newcomer who served on the Joint Shared Services and Consolidation Commission. 

“Obviously pooling our resources is an advantage and working together as a team is an advantage,” Crumiller said. “We’re all supporting each other and will do a fundraiser and a mailing and probably newspaper ads, the usual things candidates do.”

The group’s first fundraiser will be Saturday.

I think it means, we’ll have a joint campaign set up, we’ll take pictures together, do fundraisers together,” Liverman said “That doesn’t mean that we can’t support other people who are not on that team.”

The team of six may benefit from an organized effort and better use of resources but there are still three other council candidates who are left to run their own campaigns: Roger Martindell, Tamara Matteo and Scott Sillars.

“Because there are so many candidates running, it’s harder financially to get support and there are only so many volunteers,” Matteo said. “So when six people can combine their resources together, it makes a difference. It’s disappointing, but it’s politics I guess.”

Still, she believes the six’s effort is more about pooling resources than any attempt to exclude the other candidates.

“The community has been very, very supportive, the committee members have been very supportive” she said. “Being new to politics, everything is an uphill battle, learning all the ins and out, so it’s more of a disappointment than anything else.”

Sillars said he wonders why the six joined together.

“I don’t understand the motivation of some of the candidates why they decided to join,” he said. “I think citizens of Princeton looking for more change than that slate represents.”

He thinks their decision may help to differentiate his own candidacy, which includes being chairman of the Township’s citizen’s finance committee and a background in financial management.

Martindell said he understands the benefit of the six candidates pooling resources, but he’s not worried.

"Any time that a group of people backed by the organization gets together, they have substantially more resources than others and it makes their life easier," he said. "But I’m confident that the Democratic primary voters also think there is value in voices that are not just organization voices but are more open, more creative, more challenging of the status quo, more working for the little guy and I intend to continue to my candidacy in a more open, freethinking, less regimented and monolithic way for the benefit of Princeton Democrats.”

Liverman said the six candidates are not trying to slight the other three council candidates in any way.

“It’s not that we’re doing this to shun them away, it’s to have a uniform outlook,” Liverman said.

Walter Bliss, the campaign manager for the team of six, said all nine candidates competed for the opportunity to run under the banner of the Democratic organization.

“These six candidates were the ones selected for that honor and selected through an open Democratic process and they were a natural team,” Bliss said.

The Borough and Township Democratic Committees voted to endorse Howard, Miller, Liverman, Simon, Crumiller and Butler for council on March 26. In addition Sillars and Matteo were recommended to appear in the column, but without the regular Democratic party slogan.

“I think they're (the six candidates) a great team of people and stand for a great promise what people want, our public officials working together, consolidation will demand that kind of teamwork,” Bliss said.

Related Topics: Elections, Princeton, and consolidation of government

Curious Bear

8:40 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Hey Patch! Did Democratic mayoral candidates have an opinion on this? Interesting article!

Reply

HappyLife

2:57 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Were the other democratic candidates given an opportunity to participate in the group or was it limited to those candidates who were on an existing council/committee/commission?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Greta Cuyler

3:38 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

It's our understanding that it was only open to the six candidates. but it wasn't based on those who hold current positions, but those who earned the endorsement of the Borough and Township Democratic Committees back in March.

Reply

Curious Bear

3:43 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I had hoped Bernie Miller and Lance Liverman would be a welcome change to confront current Borough officials but clearly they are are aligning with Jenny Crumiller and Jo Butler so I won't be able to vote for them. A vote for Bernie or Lance is a vote for Jenny and Jo.

Reply

Harlan

4:10 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I am a Princeton Borough Democrat who shares Curious Bear's concern about the alliance between Miller and Liverman and Crumiller and Butler. I believe that Princeton should have an open competitive Democratic primary and that Crumiller and Butler are the wrong people for the new Princeton Council.

But I also think that Miller and Liverman would be good leaders. I plan to support them and vote for newcomers Tamera Matteo and Scott Sillars to replace Crumiller and Butler. I actually LIKE the fact that Matteo and Sillars did well at the PCDO endorsement vote but didn't get a stamp of approval from the official Democratic party machine!

Reply

Curious Bear

4:44 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Harlan,
I could see if there were 20 Democratic candidates and there was a real need to streamline messaging down to 6 candidates in the local Democratic party. To me, a vote for Bernie and/or Lance looks like a vote for "Borough politics as usual" for the newly combined Princeton.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Harlan

4:54 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I understand what you are saying, but I think Princeton Democrats should just ask Liverman and Miller whether they support Crumiller and Butler's divisive politics or if this is just a temporary marriage of convenience. If their answer is that they don't actually support Crumiller and Butler, then I don't see a problem in voting for them.

IpsoFacto

9:20 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I am puzzled by the candidates' decision to join as a slate; while it's clear that some candidates benefit, I don't see how this helps those candidates (Howard, Liverman, Miller) who not only received the highest number of votes at the organization meeting but who, I believe, would likely win solely on their own records and merit. But really, who cares? On June 5, each Dem primary voter can choose six candidates when he or she votes; there's no requirement that if you vote for one of the "slate six" you have to vote for any or all of the other five. It's not all or nothing! It is therefore totally illogical to say that a vote for Liverman or Miller is also, necessarily, a vote for two others. Each candidate stands on their own, regardless of whether they're pooling resources now. If you don't like Jenny or Jo, then by all means don't vote for them. I say to each voter, exercise your rights, use all six of your votes and don't get tangled in these "guilt by association" fallacies. And for Pete's sake, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater - there are several candidates among the "slate" six that have valuable experience, impressive track records of service and are honorable, smart, straightforward people, including Liverman and Miller. Choose wisely, Princeton!

Reply

Princeton resident

9:46 am on Friday, May 11, 2012

Democrats around town know that Jo Butler is the weakest candidate in this increasingly toxic Princeton Six Pack. I find it very discouraging when decent Democrats like Howard, Liverman and Miller don't have the courage to stand up and say, 'No, we won't do it' to the PCDO.

Reply

Leave a comment